The Union power ministry very recently proposed that 33kV grid infrastructure should be moved from state discoms to state transcos. Such infrastructure, referred to as “sub-transmission” has so far always come under the purview of discoms.
In the first week of August, Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd (PGCIL) announced that it commissioned its first-ever intrastate project in the TBCB (tariff-based competitive bidding) route. The project in question was the Jawaharpur-Firozabad transmission schemes in Uttar Pradesh.
Just last week, the government announced that the newly-formed Central Transmission Utility of India Ltd (CTUIL) will start operations from April 1, 2021.
Very recently, Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd (PGCIL) won three transmission projects under the tariff-based competitive bidding (TBCB) mechanism.
In a significant development, Securities & Exchanges Board of India (SEBI) very recently granted the certificate of registration to “Powergrid Infrastructure Investment Trust”, an infrastructure investment trust (InvIT) sponsored by Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. (PGCIL)
Earlier this month, Power Grid Corporation of India (PGCIL) debuted in the intrastate power transmission space by winning a concession in Uttar Pradesh, under the tariff-based competitive bidding route. The Central utility clinched the transmission scheme associated with the upcoming 2×660-mw Jawaharpur power generation project in Uttar Pradesh.
For PGCIL, which specializes in interregional and even cross-border transmission lines, winning an intrastate project assumes significance. When the TBCB mechanism was launched in January 2011, the initial projects were all of interregional lines—crucial components of the National Grid. It is only in recent years that state governments started using the TBCB mechanism for intrastate lines. However, this culture did not spread widely with only few states like Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Rajasthan and a few others, deciding to adopt this modality.
Coming back to the concession won by PGCIL, the project special purpose vehicle is “Jawaharpur Firozabad Transmission Ltd,” which was incorporated on August 20, 2018, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of REC Transmission Projects Company Ltd. This SPV has now been transferred to PGCILwho will develop the project on build, own, operate, maintain (BOOM) basis under a 35-year concession period.
The transmission scheme comprises of three broad elements:
The project will also include some more LILOs and a 132kV double-circuit line connecting the upcoming Firozabad substation to Narkhi.
UP takes the lead: It is worth observing that Uttar Pradesh has formalized three intrastate power transmission projects this year. This is a very commendable achievement considering that there was hardly any movement in other states in the intrastate TBCB power transmission space.
Of the three projects that UP formalized this year, one project (the Jawaharpur scheme discussed above) has gone to PGCIL and two have been bagged by Adani Power. In June this year, Adani Transmission Ltd (ATL) clinched the Ghatampur power transmission project under the tariff-based competitive bidding route, marking its first presence in Uttar Pradesh.
The transmission project involves around 900 ckm of transmission lines at 765kV and 400kV levels. Some major 765kV lines include Ghatampur-Agra, Agra-Greater Noida and Ghatampur-Hapur.
Incidentally, the Ghatampur project saw very aggressive bidding at the RfP stage with PGCIL being the only other contender in the race when the project ultimately went to Adani Group.
Very recently, Adani won the transmission scheme involving evacuation infrastructure for the upcoming 2×660-mw Obra-C thermal power project of state government utility Uttar Pradesh Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd (UPVUNL).
Uttar Pradesh is seen to be very aggressive in recent years, in all aspects of the power value chain—generation, transmission and distribution. The northern state is gearing up to meet growing demand from both the industrial and household sector. Under the nationwide household electrification scheme “Saubhagya”, over 68 lakh households have been electrified since October 2017. This represents nearly 30 per cent of the 231 lakh households that have been electrified since the launch of Saubhagya.
UP is doing well to expedite its power generation projects and also step up household electrification. Its effort in accelerating the creating of power transmission infrastructure is a step in the right direction.
The author of this article, Venugopal Pillai, is Editor, T&D India, may be reached on venugopal.pillai@tndindia.com. The views expressed here are personal.
Last week, NTPC announced that it has taken over a stressed power generation plant owned by the Bihar state government. The Central utility also announced that it has acquired full control of two joint ventures, in which Bihar government had equity stake. The two joint ventures are Nabinagar Power Generating Company Pvt Ltd and Kanti Bijli Utpadan Nigam Ltd.
Estimates suggest that of the total route km in India, which stands at around 67,350 rkm, the non-electrified component is 56 per cent. In the coming five years, including the imminently ending FY18, a total of 38,000 rkm is expected to be electrified.
Recently, Bihar Grid Company Ltd (BGCL) was in the news when lending agency Power Finance Corporation sanctioned financial assistance worth Rs.1,350 crore, representing the entire debt component of a Rs.1,688-crore transmission upgrade scheme. The project aims at constructing 16 transmission lines, four associated substations and seven line-bay extension works in the eastern state.
One option by which PGCIL could meaningfully engage in intrastate projects is through joint ventures with state power utilities, at least for specific projects.
Very recenty, there was a news report that Kerala State Electricity Board was seeking the involvement of Power Grid Corporation of India (PGCIL) in the southern state’s ambitious “Transgrid-2.0” project. The Rs.10,000-crore project envisages substantial upgrade to its power transmission network, and that too, with a conscious adoption of modern technology.
It is well known that even if almost all the erstwhile state electricity boards have been split into separate entities for generation, transmission and distribution, most of them still lack the technical expertise or the financial prowess to deal with complexities in their intrastate transmission networks. This is exactly why drawing upon PGCIL’s competency could be harnessed advantageously.
Special Cases
In some deserving cases, PGCIL is carrying out intrastate power transmission upgrade, thanks to extreme conditions that the state government-utilities would find difficult to contend with. For instance, PGCIL is implementing a project worth over Rs.5,000 crore to improve transmission network in topographically-challenging northeastern India, touching all northeastern states except Arunachal Pradesh. However, in Arunachal Pradesh and Sikkim alone, PGCIL has been entrusted with a Rs.4,700-crore project to improve transmission and distribution infrastructure. In Jammu & Kashmir also, PGCIL is involved in a Rs.1,800-project to connect the isolated Leh-Kargil area to the northern grid with a 220kV line. In these cases, PGCIL is playing the role of a “consultant” and has received the mandate from the Central government.
The real problem lies with states that are not “special” like the northeastern ones or Jammu & Kashmir, nor at the other extreme, are fully equipped to deal with their power transmission network.
TBCB might not work
State power utilities of course have the option of using the tariff-based competitive bidding mechanism that can bring in enterprise and investment, in a competitive environment. However, not many states of them have pursued this option aggressively although there are honourable exceptions like Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Haryana, etc. All said, the extent to which TBCB has percolated into intrastate projects, at the national level, is still shallow. Even if states float projects on the TBCB mechanism, PGCIL is free to bid just as it has successfully done in interregional lines. In such a case, states stand a potential chance to get PGCIL’s involvement. But the point is: Would PGCIL be excited enough to proactively participate in micro-level intrastate projects?
The JV option
One option by which PGCIL could meaningful engage in intrastate projects is through joint ventures with state power utilities, at least for specific projects. It has done so with Bihar, resulting in the formation of Bihar Grid Company Ltd, a 50:50 joint venture. PGCIL was engaged in similar talks with Odisha but the proposal did not take shape, ostensibly due to insufficient propulsion by the state government.
State governments must draw upon the rich technical and managerial experience of PGCIL and actively consider the joint venture route. To start with, JVs could be formed for specific but complex projects. Quite admittedly, formation of joint ventures would involve extended discussions and procedural formalities. The JV with Bihar, for instance, was formed in 2013 and has had its share of teething troubles. But once again, state governments would do well to realize that roping PGCIL has a JV partner is well worth the effort. For PGCIL too, an equity stake would mean closer bonding with the project, perhaps much more than it would in the capacity of a consultant.
(Photo: RTS Power Corporation)
(This article’s author, Venugopal Pillai, is Editor, T&D India. Views expressed here are personal. The author may be contacted on venugopal.pillai@tndindia.com)
